If we start condemning abortions for reasons we deem casual, if we think of abortion as something that should only happen under conditions we deem appropriately dire, then we, like Dr. McHugh, place ourselves in judgment of women. If we truly want to preserve a woman’s right to choose what to do with her body, we need to accept that sometimes women will abort for reasons we might not agree with. Really, being pro-choice doesn’t mean thinking every abortion is a good idea. It means realizing that the only person who should truly have the right to determine whether it’s a good idea is the mother, and protecting her rights means allowing her to make decisions we might not necessarily support. If “abortion reduction” means teaching people to protect themselves so they don’t get pregnant in the first place, great. But if it means reducing the number of circumstances under which abortion is sanctioned — whether those circumstances include the life of the mother, the health of the fetus, or the duration of the pregnancy — then abortion reduction is really not a pro-choice position, because it takes the choice out of the hands of the mother, where, ultimately, it belongs.

Comments (View)
Notes
  1. bildungsroman reblogged this from peterwknox
  2. holeysoley reblogged this from peterwknox
  3. mittenstategirl reblogged this from peterwknox
  4. snickerdoodle reblogged this from peterwknox
  5. dederants reblogged this from peterwknox
  6. peterwknox posted this
blog comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2007 - 2010   Peter W. Knox



We Recommend Cheap Web Hosting Seller